What is the significance of carbon 12 when talking about a mole

Unfortunately, this standard weight slightly changes over the years without any clear explanation: this is not very satisfactory. It seems possible to get a new definition for the mass unit with a fixed Planck constant without unit. By comparing a mechanical power and an electrical power, mass is found to be proportional to frequency. Then, it would no longer be necessary to consider the mass unit as a base unit.

Consequently, the mole would also lose its status of base unit. The choice of a fixed carbon molar mass would decrease the number of base units by one. It is attractive from a metrology point of view.

The silicon sphere method compares experimentally the macroscopic volume of a sphere and the microscopical one of a single atom. There are thus two independent entries to the molar mass table. This is not the most favorable situation. The isotopic abundance determination remains a weak step in the silicon sphere method. One should point out that there are considerable efforts going on to enrich silicon into its most abundant natural isotope so that difficulties with isotopic abundances will be overcome.

One may also note that any other isotope could be introduced in place of carbon in relation 1, particularly an element having a single stable isotope that could also be used in place of silicon for the experimental volume comparison. However, is it possible? The exact number 12 is designated by A r 12 C and called carbon atomic weight; it has no unit.

Although it is not strictly speaking a weight, this word is accepted by IUPAC due to its long traditional use and as a tribute to Dalton. By definition, the molar mass M r is this number expressed with a unit that is the kilogram. One can write:. M u is called molar mass constant.

With the new proposal of a fixed N A , molar mass M 12 C is known with a standard deviation; it is no longer fixed and will slightly fluctuate at the rythm of the accuracy improvement of experimental methods. Consequently, the molar mass constant M u will also fluctuate so that the value 12 for the carbon atomic weight will remain constant.

However, this situation seems rather unfortunate. To use a unit conversion factor that is not really a constant is disturbing. Moreover, Martin and Mills recommend a larger use of M u , especially in teaching. Finally, if a chemist wants to compute a number of mole, he will use a balance so that the weight of the substance is known with a mass unit: This result will then be divided by the molar mass also expressed with a mass unit, not by the relative atomic weight which has no unit.

For this reason, it is important that element molar masses be constant. A good definition for a base unit is supposed to provide a standard that can be easily used by anyone anywhere in the world. The definition proposed by Mills and Martin means that one has to count atoms. It does not seem possible to get a standard by this method. A weighing balance is the tool used by a chemist to measure an amount of substance with the help of molar masses.

While the kilogram is needed in the present definition, it disappears from the new definition, yet it still has to be used to measure an amount of substance. Thus, why not keep a mass unit in the mole definition and maintain the present definition. For these reasons, the choices of a fixed M 12 C and of the actual definition are favored. Quantities, Units, and Symbols in Physical Chemistry , 2nd edn. Mills, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford ; 3rd edn. Taylor and P. Berzelius Kibble, J.

Sanders, and A. Questions regarding the website, please contact edit. The mole is that amount of substance that contains the same number of entities as 12 grams of carbon This is the current definition.

The mole is that amount of substance that contains exactly 6. This is the proposed new definition. It has the effect of fixing the value of the Avogadro constant to be exactly 6.

The choice 1 is connected with the history of the development of the quantity amount of substance and the unit mole. The choice 2 is thought to be simpler, and removes the dependence on the kilogram; this is thought to be desirable, in order to clarify the distinction between the quantities amount of substance and mass which are often confused.

Although I can see advantages in choice 1, most people prefer choice 2 because of its simplicity. He argues that the Avogadro constant is free for us to choose; we could choose to have a different number of entities in a mole; it is at our choice.

Many people express that view. However, I believe that is a misunderstanding. Redefining the mole What is the mole? Why did it need redefining in ? Share this post. Great course 20 Apr, In 3 weeks the fundamentals of thermodynamics. Fantastic course. Visit the course. Thermodynamics Course 19 Apr, A hard subject 25 May, I correctly titled this course has Excellent overview 23 Apr, The course provided an excellent overview of the basics of thermodynamics. The level was a little 21 Aug, The level was a little difficult, but in general the course was very interesting!

Thank you! Very interactive? Wonderful site and great experie Want to keep learning? This content is taken from University of Hull online course,. This content is taken from University of Hull online course. See other articles from this course. A mole of anything, then, contains as many particles as there are in 12 g of carbon During the s, chemists agreed to use exactly 12 g of carbon as their standard.

Related questions How do you calculate the number of moles from volume? How do you convert grams to mole? Question e5. Question 8d48c. Why is the mole an important unit to chemists? What's the mole number? How does the mole relate to molecules and ions?